- Det giver jo ingen mening, det du siger, lød det til Pernille Vermund i Deadline på DR2 torsdag aften.

Læs historien her: http://www.dr.dk/nyheder/politik/video-deadline-vaert-til-vermund-undskyld-mig-det-giver-jo-ingen-mening

---
Her på vores YouTube-kanal får du udvalgte nyhedsklip fra DR Nyheder. Det kan f.eks. være fra TV AVISEN, Deadline eller DR2.

Du er velkommen til at indlejre/embedde klippene på din hjemmeside.
 
Du kan altid finde programmer fra DR Nyheder i sin fulde længde på http://www.dr.dk/tv/find-program/genre/nyheder%20og%20aktualitet og læse flere nyheder på http://dr.dk/nyheder.
 
Tag DR Nyheder med dig:
Nyheds-app: Send sms med "APP" til 1212 eller hent den i App Store eller Google Play.
Nyhedsbreve: http://nyhedsbreve.dr.dk/ 
Facebook: http://facebook.com/drnyheder
Twitter: http://twitter.com/DRnyheder (alle nyheder) og http://twitter.com/DRbreaking (kun breaking)
Abonner på YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8tSbn8Q4rnsSQPY-1kzXuw?sub_confirmation=1

Husk at tale pænt. Profilen her modereres efter DRs regler for god opførsel på DRs sociale profiler. Du kan læse dem her: http://www.dr.dk/om-dr/regler-god-opfoersel-paa-drs-sociale-profiler.

If you can create a majority without leading a bourgeois policy, then the situation would be that you have an opposition on the left for the government, and on the value policy you have an opposition on the right.

But Pernille Wermund, I'm sorry, but what you're saying doesn't make any sense.

There are ultimate requirements, and if they are not met by Lars Lykke Rasmussen, you would not vote for him.

And you would not elect him, but you would ensure that he becomes Prime Minister.

The situation is that in order to become a prime minister, you need to have a large number of people against you.

So if you want to become a prime minister, you need to collect the necessary mandates.

And that's 90, so that you don't have a large number

So you would support Lars Løkke Rasmussen, no matter what?

No, I would support him if he took these 3 demands.

And if he doesn't want to do it, what is the consequence?

The consequence of that is that you don't want to vote

The consequence could be, as there is also rumour about, that he joins the Defense and Social Democrats and says, now we are completely Social Democrats.

Then I would of course say, if the left goes all the way on the economic policy, then I am ready to say that he will not get our backing, and then we will also be ready to vote

if he has backing from citizen politicians to lead a citizen policy without new citizens, then I would not vote for him to stand on his back or on the shoulders of the left wing.


Speaker 0: If you can create a majority without leading a bourgeois policy, then the situation would be that you have an opposition on the left for the government, and on the value policy you have an opposition on the right.

Speaker 1: But Pernille Wermund, I'm sorry, but what you're saying doesn't make any sense. There are ultimate requirements, and if they are not met by Lars Lykke Rasmussen, you would not vote for him. And you would not elect him, but you would ensure that he becomes Prime Minister. That is

Speaker 0: not the same. It is not the same. The situation is that in order to become a prime minister, you need to have a large number of people against you. So if you want to become a prime minister, you need to collect the necessary mandates. And that's 90, so that you don't have a large number

Speaker 1: of people against you. So you would support Lars Løkke Rasmussen, no matter what?

Speaker 0: No, I would support him if he took these 3 demands.

Speaker 1: And if he doesn't want to do it, what is the consequence? The consequence of that is that you don't want to vote

Speaker 0: for him. The consequence could be, as there is also rumour about, that he joins the Defense and Social Democrats and says, now we are completely Social Democrats. Then I would of course say, if the left goes all the way on the economic policy, then I am ready to say that he will not get our backing, and then we will also be ready to vote

Speaker 1: for him. But

Speaker 0: if he has backing from citizen politicians to lead a citizen policy without new citizens, then I would not vote for him to stand on his back or on the shoulders of the left wing.

See all P3 Essensen transcripts on Youtube

Vermund i clinch med Deadline-vært: Det giver jo ingen mening, det du siger - Deadline