Taken from JRE #1997 w/Cameron Hanes:
https://open.spotify.com/episode/2no4FojhCmDAbKTj8EhBJw?si=b5fd540bc8b6423b

It's nerve wracking man because the people that have that kind of money and that kind of power they want to maintain that position and they want to maintain that influence over people and the best way to maintain it is to like tighten down on what people are allowed to do.

I mean the CEO of Pfizer there was a famous speech where he's giving was talking about a pill that you would have to take that sends off a signal to show that you've taken it and he says Imagine the compliance This is what he says.

No, let's find that find where he says that because it's so bonkers like compliance like You know It's comply.

Yeah, you're making people that you see force You're that word That term just the thought process behind that statement is so great

courage would be better Comply like you have no choice

Here it says edited to cut important context CEO Albert Borah explains, so what is the what is the actual but it's it's okay Says the video discussing ingestible pills with sensors has gone viral, falsely presented as an interview from 2022 and edited to cut out important context.

1 Twitter user shared the clip on May 20 here, commenting, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla explains Pfizer's new tech to Davos crowd, ingestible pills, a pill with a tiny chip to send a wireless signal to relevant authorities when the pharmaceutical has been digested.

See this is 1 of those things where you gotta wonder if they're trying to gaslight you with the headline.

He commented on biological sensors during a conversation on general technological advances in healthcare and pharmaceuticals.

In response to a question from the audience, ideas to engage patient, he calls the research and field fascinating.

He says that there's already a pill approved by the US Food and Drug Administration.

He moves on to describe this pill, and where the clip version seen on social media begins, and he later concludes, but of course, there will be an initial cost and someone needs to invest.

Boiler was not talking about a Pfizer drug or technology, rather he was describing, Abilify Mycite, a drug with a digital ingestion traction system, right?

Okay, for the treatment of schizophrenia, acute treatment of manic and mixed episodes associated with bipolar 1 disorder, and for use as an add-on treatment for depression in adults.

So he was talking about a different pit, but he was talking about a pill with a sensor

that is true so they can say well as for this Schizophrenia or manic so that's why they that's how they got it approved, but now it's out there

right well now It's an actual technology, and if they can mandate

a medication that you have to take for something else.

They make it sound good by, oh, maybe that would help those people, but now it can be used on everybody.

So it basically is a biological chip that is in in the tablet and once you take the tablet and dissolves in your stomach It sends a signal that you took the tablet so imagine the applications of that compliance So did he say imagine the applications of that compliance, and then they edit it to say, imagine the compliance?

It is basically biological chip, that it is in the tablet.

And once you take the tablet and dissolves into your stomach, it sends a signal that you took the tablet.

So imagine the applications of that, the compliance, The insurance companies to know that the medicines that patients should take, they do take them.

It is fascinating what happens in this field.

But he's saying, So if you have a schizophrenic patient,

didn't take their medicine like they're supposed to.

But yeah, you could use that on anything then.

Once they get it down the whatever approved, then it's there.

And once it's been applied before they can apply it to other things And if they can mandate that everybody takes a medication They have

especially if you have an application now if you have an application this World Health Organization Digital passport it sends a signal to your passport And if you don't you you're not going anywhere and

and the fucking headline that they had to that.

It's like yeah, that's that thing that they

we were reading this thing about Al Pacino.

There's this whole article and the type of the article was Al Pacino feels like Reports are that Al Pacino felt like the girl hoodwinked him and this and that and then below that in small letters After we talked to him, that's not true So the head so look at this look at this check out this fucking Here we'll go back look at this This is a really special coming at this time Al Pacino 83 break silence to celebrate 29 year old girlfriend's pregnancy after claims He demanded paternity tests because she hoodwinked him the actor revealed he and his girlfriend Noor al-fawla were expecting last week initial reports claimed that al was not pleased over the news Sources told Daily Mail that wasn't true, Which he has now confirmed

below the big headline that says Break silence to celebrate 29 year old girlfriend's pregnancy After claims that he demanded paternity test because she hoodwinked him.

So they're allowed to do that just like they were allowed in that last headline

I sort of understand this 1 because there were a bunch of claims that he was mad and they're like

No, no, no, no, no, no, not the Al Pacino 1.

Go back to the other headline the Borla 1 What was the headline that discredited?

That's right there and it's not Pfizer's tech is the problem.

It was also in 2018 and they're saying that this was new a year ago,

So it's a different thing and in application for schizophrenics I understand that as well I know people that are schizophrenic and I know people that go off their medication and lose their fucking mind and it's dangerous It's weird.

When Brody was off his medication, there was a moment when Brody was around the store when he was off his medication and people were trying to get him back on it.

And he was really struggling and I've seen it.

So if you had a situation like that, where you can ensure that Brody was taking his medication, Maybe Brody would still be with us.

But it's also he's a human being and like maybe you should just try to get someone to be with him and make sure he takes his medication rather than forcing a new technology down the throats of everyone for a very small percentage of people that absolutely have to take medication or they go crazy because most people don't have to do that.

So to have that kind of tech available, that freaks me out.


Speaker 0: The Jorogun experience.

Speaker 1: It's nerve wracking man because the people that have that kind of money and that kind of power they want to maintain that position and they want to maintain that influence over people and the best way to maintain it is to like tighten down on what people are allowed to do.

Speaker 2: Yeah.

Speaker 1: Where they have to comply. I mean the CEO of Pfizer there was a famous speech where he's giving was talking about a pill that you would have to take that sends off a signal to show that you've taken it and he says Imagine the compliance This is what he says. Yeah, have you seen that? No, let's find that find where he says that because it's so bonkers like compliance like You know It's comply. Yeah, you're making people that you see force You're that word That term just the thought process behind that statement is so great

Speaker 0: courage would be better Comply like you have no choice

Speaker 1: Here it says edited to cut important context CEO Albert Borah explains, so what is the what is the actual but it's it's okay Says the video discussing ingestible pills with sensors has gone viral, falsely presented as an interview from 2022 and edited to cut out important context. 1 Twitter user shared the clip on May 20 here, commenting, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla explains Pfizer's new tech to Davos crowd, ingestible pills, a pill with a tiny chip to send a wireless signal to relevant authorities when the pharmaceutical has been digested. Imagine the compliance, he says. Now, is that really what he said? So what does he really say?

Speaker 0: Yeah, there's a video.

Speaker 1: What's cut out if he says that? See this is 1 of those things where you gotta wonder if they're trying to gaslight you with the headline. He commented on biological sensors during a conversation on general technological advances in healthcare and pharmaceuticals. So what has he said? In response to a question from the audience, ideas to engage patient, he calls the research and field fascinating.

He says that there's already a pill approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. He moves on to describe this pill, and where the clip version seen on social media begins, and he later concludes, but of course, there will be an initial cost and someone needs to invest. Boiler was not talking about a Pfizer drug or technology, rather he was describing, Abilify Mycite, a drug with a digital ingestion traction system, right? So that is it. Okay, for the treatment of schizophrenia, acute treatment of manic and mixed episodes associated with bipolar 1 disorder, and for use as an add-on treatment for depression in adults.

So he was talking about a different pit, but he was talking about a pill with a sensor

Speaker 0: But the point is

Speaker 1: that same

Speaker 0: that is true so they can say well as for this Schizophrenia or manic so that's why they that's how they got it approved, but now it's out there

Speaker 1: right well now It's an actual technology, and if they can mandate

Speaker 0: right

Speaker 1: a medication that you have to take for something else.

Speaker 2: They make it sound good by, oh, maybe that would help those people, but now it can be used on everybody.

Speaker 1: Yeah. So here it says that. So it basically is a biological chip that is in in the tablet and once you take the tablet and dissolves in your stomach It sends a signal that you took the tablet so imagine the applications of that compliance So did he say imagine the applications of that compliance, and then they edit it to say, imagine the compliance?

Speaker 3: I think that's what it's saying.

Speaker 1: Let's see him say it.

Speaker 0: Here's the- I

Speaker 3: was gonna say, we should play the video.

Speaker 1: Yeah, let's play the video.

Speaker 3: That is the question, and then-

Speaker 1: Let's play the video. So it

Speaker 3: would be this 1.

Speaker 4: It is basically biological chip, that it is in the tablet. And once you take the tablet and dissolves into your stomach, it sends a signal that you took the tablet. So imagine the applications of that, the compliance, The insurance companies to know that the medicines that patients should take, they do take them. It is fascinating what happens in this field.

Speaker 1: That doesn't comfort me. If that's what you really said.

Speaker 0: But he's saying, So if you have a schizophrenic patient,

Speaker 1: Right, and they have to take

Speaker 2: it. To know that they did or

Speaker 0: didn't take their medicine like they're supposed to. Yes. But yeah, you could use that on anything then.

Speaker 1: You could use it on anything.

Speaker 0: Once they get it down the whatever approved, then it's there.

Speaker 1: Exactly, exactly. And once it's been applied before they can apply it to other things And if they can mandate that everybody takes a medication They have

Speaker 0: it for health and safety,

Speaker 1: especially if you have an application now if you have an application this World Health Organization Digital passport it sends a signal to your passport And if you don't you you're not going anywhere and

Speaker 0: they just say it's for health and safety

Speaker 1: It's all bonkers.

Speaker 0: Yeah,

Speaker 1: and the fucking headline that they had to that. It's like yeah, that's that thing that they

Speaker 0: know Yeah,

Speaker 1: we were reading this thing about Al Pacino. There's this whole article and the type of the article was Al Pacino feels like Reports are that Al Pacino felt like the girl hoodwinked him and this and that and then below that in small letters After we talked to him, that's not true So the head so look at this look at this check out this fucking Here we'll go back look at this This is a really special coming at this time Al Pacino 83 break silence to celebrate 29 year old girlfriend's pregnancy after claims He demanded paternity tests because she hoodwinked him the actor revealed he and his girlfriend Noor al-fawla were expecting last week initial reports claimed that al was not pleased over the news Sources told Daily Mail that wasn't true, Which he has now confirmed

Speaker 2: then why so

Speaker 1: he's confirmed. It's not true

Speaker 0: still in the headline, right?

Speaker 1: But that's in little tiny letters.

Speaker 0: Yeah

Speaker 1: below the big headline that says Break silence to celebrate 29 year old girlfriend's pregnancy After claims that he demanded paternity test because she hoodwinked him. Yeah claims claims By who? Yeah, but that's a headline. So they're allowed to do that just like they were allowed in that last headline

Speaker 0: That's what drives me crazy.

Speaker 1: So what was the last headline go back?

Speaker 3: I sort of understand this 1 because there were a bunch of claims that he was mad and they're like

Speaker 1: No, no, no, no, no, no, not the Al Pacino 1. Go back to the other headline the Borla 1 What was the headline that discredited?

Speaker 3: That's right there and it's not Pfizer's tech is the problem.

Speaker 1: Okay, so it's but it's new tech

Speaker 0: Yeah, whether it's fine.

Speaker 1: It's still the CEO of Pfizer.

Speaker 0: It's at the World Economic Forum

Speaker 3: It was also in 2018 and they're saying that this was new a year ago,

Speaker 0: which it's

Speaker 1: not even.

Speaker 3: Who cares?

Speaker 1: Even if it's 2018, it's still crazy.

Speaker 0: Yeah, it is.

Speaker 1: It's still crazy. And I get it that it was pre pandemic. So it's a different thing and in application for schizophrenics I understand that as well I know people that are schizophrenic and I know people that go off their medication and lose their fucking mind and it's dangerous It's weird.

Speaker 0: It would probably

Speaker 1: When Brody was off his medication, there was a moment when Brody was around the store when he was off his medication and people were trying to get him back on it. And he was really struggling and I've seen it. So if you had a situation like that, where you can ensure that Brody was taking his medication, Maybe Brody would still be with us. I don't know. But maybe he'd be okay.

Maybe. But it's also he's a human being and like maybe you should just try to get someone to be with him and make sure he takes his medication rather than forcing a new technology down the throats of everyone for a very small percentage of people that absolutely have to take medication or they go crazy because most people don't have to do that. Right. So to have that kind of tech available, that freaks me out.

See all PowerfulJRE transcripts on Youtube

Watching the Pfizer CEO's 2019 Comments About Pills with Sensors