- The piece discusses the attack on voting rights in the United States.
- It highlights how various states have passed laws that restrict voter access, including crackdowns on mail-in and early voting, stricter voter ID requirements, and voter roll purges.
- The bills disproportionately affect people of color and make it harder for them to vote.
- The piece mentions the role of well-funded groups like the Heritage Foundation in pushing for these laws.
- It also mentions Supreme Court decisions that have made it easier for states to pass discriminatory voting laws and harder to challenge them.
- The piece concludes by emphasizing the racial impact of these laws and the need to address the attack on voting rights.

- The piece discusses the issue of voter suppression in the United States.
- It highlights instances where black elected officials are silenced by their white colleagues when pointing out the disproportionate impact of voter restriction bills.
- The justification for these bills has shifted from voter fraud to a lack of trust in the system.
- The piece criticizes the lack of evidence for voter fraud claims and highlights the deliberate manufacturing of problems to pass unnecessary restrictions.
- Proposed legislation, such as the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act and the Freedom to Vote Act, aim to address these issues, but face opposition from politicians like Mitch McConnell.
- The piece calls for an end to the filibuster in order to protect voting rights.
- It criticizes Joe Biden's response to the issue and calls for his support in eliminating the filibuster and endorsing the For the People Act.
- The piece emphasizes that relying on the perseverance of the American spirit is not enough to combat voter suppression and urges politicians to take significant action to address the problem.

John Oliver discusses the current attacks on voting rights, who’s behind them, and what we can do about it.

Connect with Last Week Tonight online... 

Subscribe to the Last Week Tonight YouTube channel for more almost news as it almost happens: www.youtube.com/lastweektonight 

Find Last Week Tonight on Facebook like your mom would: www.facebook.com/lastweektonight 

Follow us on Twitter for news about jokes and jokes about news: www.twitter.com/lastweektonight 

Visit our official site for all that other stuff at once: www.hbo.com/lastweektonight

-♪ ♪ -♪ ♪ Our main story tonight concerns voting.

It is the subject of countless election PSAs, which are always basically the same.

Celebrities essentially begging you to vote.

But in 1988, there was a strikingly different 1.

All I'm gonna say about this is, there is a surprise at the end, and also, at the beginning.

200 years ago, the Constitution of the United States suggested a very simple way to keep fools like these out of our government.

That is a bold move, putting your name so close to Hitler.

I will say, it does actually fit pretty well, considering that members only would have been a perfect slogan for the Nazis.

But I want to talk to you about voting, because as you undoubtedly know, the latest attack on voting rights in America is well underway.

A new report from the Brennan Center shows that between January and July, these 18 states passed 30 laws that restrict voter access.

They include crackdowns on mail-in and early voting, harsher voter ID requirements, and voter roll purges.

All those states passed laws that make it harder for people to vote.

And if anyone is surprised to see New Hampshire up there, let me just remind you, it's a state that's 88 percent white with a Republican governor and no adult seat belt law.

Sure, they present themselves as charming, but deep down, they are basically just Florida with foliage.

And some of the biggest efforts to undermine voting rights have been concentrated in the closest states in last year's election, especially these 3, where Biden's combined margin of victory was less than 43,000 votes.

If they had gone the other way, Trump would still be president right now, meaning COVID would be even worse, we'd be at war with, I don't know, let's say Luxembourg, and we'd all be living under Attorney General MyPillowGuy.

I know things are bleak right now, but depressingly, it's also important to remember, this is technically the better timeline.

And I know that those pushing these bills claim that critics of them are completely distorting what is inside them, and that any objections could simply be cleared up with a basic step.

I would encourage people to actually read the bill, find out what the facts are.

--AUDIENCE LAUGHS- It's time to read the bill.

Read the bill and show me 1 person who's eligible to vote that will not be able to vote.

All right, well, if that is your criteria, then you obviously win.

no 1 is going to find a bill that literally says, this specific person should not be allowed to vote.

Even though we all know there is someone who shouldn't be allowed to vote, and it's this guy.

His favorite season of The Wire is I Haven't Watched It Yet.

And his list of celebrities he'd have sex with outside of marriage is exclusively 5 times the wheel from Wheel of Fortune.

But the thing is, If you do actually read these bills, you quickly find they absolutely make it harder to vote, and particularly for certain people.

So tonight, we thought we would take a look at the attack on voting rights and how best to fight it.

And let's start with what is in these bills, because it's a lot.

For instance, in Texas, where, remember, that guy claimed you can't find a single instance of voter suppression, 1 thing their bill does is roll back a lot of the innovative measures put in place during the pandemic that made voting more accessible.

Among other things, it gets rid of 24-hour and drive-through voting, both methods that Harris County implemented last year.

And as the county clerk who oversaw that election points out, when you look at the precincts where those methods were most popular, it's clear that the harm is pretty targeted.

Because 56% of voters in November who used 24-hour voting were people of color.

Why are we taking drive-thru voting away?

Because 53% of those voters in 2020 were people of color.

Yeah, it's pretty obvious who is being targeted there.

They may as well say, you can't arrive at a polling place exhibiting a face in the Fenty 300s or higher.

Sure, you're not saying people of color, but we all know what the fuck is happening.

Texas and all these other states have added new barriers to voting by mail.

Coincidentally, just a year after elections in which the percentage of black people who voted by mail surged past white voters.

Meanwhile, all these states have put harsher voter ID requirements in place, even though federal court cases found Black and Latino voters in states with harsh laws disproportionately lacked access to the types of voter IDs required to vote.

So already, when you do read these bills, you quickly find some shit in plain view.

It's like a second grader playing hide and seek.

You're bigger than the coffee table, bud.

I can see your feet, hands, full face, and you're giggling very loudly.

And some of those pushing these bills, like this state representative from Georgia, even argued that if a law does make it harder to vote, that's not necessarily a bad thing.

I do believe that voting in this country is a privilege.

And it's a right as well, but it ought to mean enough where you can put forth a little bit of effort in trying to cast your ballot.

Okay, except something can't be a right and a privilege that you need to work for, because those are 2 completely different things.

For instance, it is a right for Brandon Caruso to imagine what hot, tawdry sex with the Wheel of Fortune would be like.

To imagine climbing on top of it and taking her all in.

Yeah, that's right, the studio audience is there.

And they're rooting for him, because he did it.

Imagining how good that'd feel is Brandon's right, but actually getting to grab those pegs and give the wheel a spin, that is a privilege that should take years of effort.

Republicans have been pushing restrictive voting laws for years.

Back in 2013, North Carolina crafted a law that made it so the only acceptable forms of voter ID were the ones disproportionately used by white people in a bill a federal appeals court later said targeted African-American voters with almost surgical precision, which has to be the second worst context in which to hear that phrase, topped only by surgery.

Look, ma'am, your husband's surgery was...

We got in there with almost surgical precision.

My team's not 100% yet, but we were really close on this 1.

And frequently, these laws have been helped along by well-funded groups like the Heritage Foundation, whose co-founder, Paul Weyrich, famously admitted, I don't want everybody to vote.

And whose former president, Jim DeMint, once approvingly said, in the states where they do have voter ID laws, you've actually seen elections begin to change towards more conservative candidates.

Pretty much giving the whole game away there.

Just this year, the executive director of their sister organization, Heritage Action, actually bragged about their role in pushing this year's new bills.

We're working with these state legislators to make sure they have all of the information they need to draft the bills.

In some cases, we actually draft them for them.

Iowa's huge victory, Governor Reynolds signed the bill on March 8th.

Little fanfare, honestly, nobody even noticed.

My team looked at each other and were like, -"It can't be that easy." --LAUGHTER Like, it can't be that easy.

Max Ivanka Trump, because Anyone saying it can't be that easy to do anything other than sneaking their own snacks into the movies absolutely must be stopped.

The point here is, this has been a concerted, organized effort over many years.

But the reason it now has a much higher chance of working.

It has to do with a pair of Supreme Court decisions that gutted the landmark 1965 Voting Rights Act, which prohibited racial discrimination in voting.

The first decision, Shelby County versus Holder, basically released these areas, which had a prior history of discriminatory voting laws, from having to run any new ones past the federal government first before they took effect.

And the second 1, Brenevich versus DNC, essentially found that even if a voting restriction has a discriminatory impact, that in itself doesn't necessarily violate the Voting Rights Act.

Those 2 decisions basically made it easier for some states to pass discriminatory laws, while at the same time, making it much harder for anyone to challenge them.

And given that, 1 of the dwindling ways that you can still successfully sue under the VRA is by demonstrating a bill is racially motivated, it is hardly surprising that those passing these new laws have been quick to shut down any discussion of their racial impact.

In fact, in Texas, in the midst of debating their new bill, there was this incredible moment.

Members, this is a reminder to everyone, to be civil and respectful of our colleagues as we debate SB1.

The chair would appreciate members not using the word racism this afternoon.

Look, look, if the word you don't want people to use is racism, I hate to break it to you, but you're doing a racism.

Someone might have told you that sooner, but in fairness, you told them they're not allowed.

A constant theme in debates over these bills is black elected officials pointing out their impact and their white colleagues telling them to be quiet.

In Arizona, back in April, they were debating a bill that makes it hard for many voters to receive an early ballot in the mail.

But watch what happened when 1 lawmaker started pointing out the disproportionate impacts that that would have.

The effect of this bill will make it harder for independent voters, seniors, Native Americans, black, brown, and low-income people to vote.

Okay, you should never shout someone down when they only want to say 12 words.

Unless, of course, those 12 words are, his testicles became swollen, his friend was weeks away from getting married.

And look, and look, I know, that obviously does not look good, but wait until you see that man's colleague read from the rule book to explain his point of order.

In accordance with Rule 19A, no member shall be permitted to indulge in personalities, use language personally offensive, arraign motives of members, charge deliberate misrepresentation, or use language tending to hold a member of the House or Senate up to contempt.

And I feel personally that motives were arraigned of members, including myself, with regards to colored people, black people, whatever people this individual wants to single out in their ability to vote.

And I don't think it's correct, and I think he should be sat down and he shouldn't be allowed to speak.

The very second someone starts reading you the rules from a weird, tiny book, they can just fuck right off into the sun.

Also, For the record, if you say the words, colored people, and it is not immediately preceded by National Association for the Advancement of, you are officially in time out.

But Republicans cannot just claim that they are not being racist in pushing these bills.

Well, for years, they claimed that there was an epidemic of voter fraud, despite the fact actual instances of that are incredibly rare.

So they have now shifted their justification from something measurable, what people are doing, to something much less tangible, what they are feeling.

Just listen to the Lieutenant Governor of Texas making that exact pitch.

The bill is needed because Americans no longer trust the system.

And a country where voters do not trust the system is a country in peril.

Yeah, okay, but you still need a reason to legislate against something.

If that were the case, I would propose a bill to outlaw Tilda Swinton.

She looks like a ghost who knows exactly how and when you will die, but won't tell you because it's more fun for her that way.

But look, I will say, despite the fact state and local officials found the last election to be the most secure in American history, the truth is, many Republicans don't trust the system.

But the reason for that might be that People like Dan Patrick spent all of last year calling voting by mail a scam by Democrats to steal the election, and saying shit like this.

Look, when you have an opportunity to steal a vote, the Democrats will take advantage of it.

You can swing the balance easily at, I could give you 10 scenarios, but I won't, because I don't want to give anyone ideas how you could easily steal thousands of votes.

I can give you 10 scenarios, but I won't is just such an obvious lie.

It's right up there with, I have a girlfriend, she goes to a different school, you wouldn't know her.

Or, I've never sexually fantasized about lobsters.

What are we looking for if not someone who knows what they want, but also hates you.

We want their claws pinching our earlobes.

You know, like when the dentist says, does this hurt?

And you say, no, but you mean yes, because you're kind of curious what this dentist can do when pushed.

Bonk, bonk, bonk, bonk, bonk, bonk, bonk, bonk, bonk, bonk.

Fuck me stupid, you weaponized ocean bitch.

Here is 4 hit reasons why it'd be cool to fuck an adult-sized lobster on holiday.

They live a long time, meaning that they know what they're doing.

Their backs are incredibly strong and responsive.

I shouldn't have to explain to you why that's good sexually.

They're incapable of racism, and they can't talk and ruin the mood.

And they just sort of wobble their horrible black eyes around.

My point here is, we all think about having sex with burdened, unhappy lobsters all the time, even in winter, and that is why we should not listen to Dan Patrick or, honestly, whoever it was I was talking about earlier, I don't remember.

There is a reason that Patrick can give you 10 scenarios for Democrats stealing elections, but no evidence, and that is because despite saying he would pay up to a million dollars for evidence of voter fraud, he has, to put it mildly, not paid out.

And local election supervisors themselves will tell you that these bills make no sense.

The Florida supervisors of elections strongly opposed their state's new bill, with 1 Republican supervisor telling a reporter, -"It's stupid, okay?

It was a solution, looking for a problem." -$$TRANSPORT But it's actually 1 step worse than that.

Because these are solutions to problems that have been deliberately and strategically manufactured.

Use bullshit claims to stir up baseless fear to pass unnecessary restrictions targeting particular groups.

The nonsense audit in Arizona came to a humiliating conclusion that failed to show yet again that Trump was cheated of victory, but its organizers still recommended the legislature tighten up the election process to provide additional certainty going forward.

It's all a shameless attempt to get to the same place.

Well, the good news is, there is proposed legislation that addresses many of the problems that you've seen tonight.

The John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act would restore parts of the VRA the Supreme Court gutted, and more substantially, there is the Freedom to Vote Act, which would, among other things, make voting by mail available for every voter, make Election Day a public holiday, and make automatic voter registration a national standard.

Unfortunately, Mitch McConnell has announced that he will filibuster any attempt to get either of those acts passed.

So, If we want to protect the ballot, which we absolutely should, we need to end the filibuster.

And you would hope that every national democratic politician would be absolutely screaming about this, but some are doing the exact opposite.

Joe Manchin has consistently defended the filibuster.

And when Joe Biden was asked if he supports doing away with it to specifically protect voting rights, this was his maddening answer.

What I don't want to do is get wrapped up right now in the argument whether or not this is all about the filibuster or...

Look, the American public, you can't stop them from voting.

More people voted last time than any time in American history in the middle of the worst pandemic in American history.

Or maybe they'll show up and get turned away because of everything that we've been talking about here.

Biden's White House even reportedly told voting rights groups that it is possible to out-organize voter suppression.

As activists and actual organizers will tell you.

I'm very upset with President Biden, because

like he's not advocating for us in this moment.

And what I want him to see is, is to stop saying to out-organize voter suppression.

I want him to support the elimination of the filibuster.

I want him to support and endorse the For the People Act, because he needs to step up to the plate.

The solution to voter suppression cannot be to just vote, for the same reason that the solution to being locked out of your home can't be to tell someone, -"Just go inside and get the keys." -$25,000.

How are you not understanding this situation?

All of this is to say to Joe's Biden, Manchin, and any other Joe who wants to skip doing anything significant and instead rely on the perseverance of the American spirit.

I know it is tempting to bang the optimistic drum that more Americans showed up last year than ever before and by gum, they'll do it again.

But here is the thing, the Republicans know that that might happen.

And anyone unwilling to do what it takes to actually tackle this problem should, and I cannot believe I'm going to borrow this quote, really be sat down and not allowed to speak.

See all LastWeekTonight transcripts on Youtube

Voting Rights: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO)